Kelo

Monday 9th November 2009 08:26pm 1
Rich
Rich
122 Posts
Remember that eminent domain case that the supreme court ruled on? Well...

http://www.melissaclouthier.com/2009/11/09/remember-the-kelo-decision-this-is-what-happened-next/

Monday 9th November 2009 08:52pm 2
Master of Her Domain
Master of Her Domain
136 Posts
I saw that on the news website, and didn't put two and two together. Hmmm... I'll have to check that out. OUTRAGEOUS!!!!
Monday 9th November 2009 09:18pm 3
Rich
Rich
122 Posts

Yup state/city grabbed the property, everyone moved, area leveled, and now where there was once a neigborhood there is nothing. Terrible.

Monday 8th March 2010 06:30pm 4
Rich
Rich
122 Posts
Monday 8th March 2010 07:20pm 5
Sherri Sherpy, The MN Mortgage Mom
Sherri Sherpy, The MN Mortgage Mom
16 Posts
"governments can seize property to increase potential tax revenues..."

This is just so wrong!
Monday 8th March 2010 08:59pm 6
JP
JP
27 Posts
As someone who used to work on eminent domain cases and wrote about the "public use" doctrine quite a bit, it's never as simple as it first appears. Public use has been in place for millenia (everything used to be owned by the crown, right) and used by municipalities to improve their commercial base; largest example would be Manhattan. Eminent domain cases are not the easiest cases to win and they are extremely complicated. Remember folks, right to property is not inviolate; Fifth Amendment states:"nor shall private property be taken for public use, without just compensation." Just compensation = fair market value. Don't like it, amend the Constitution!
Monday 8th March 2010 10:34pm 7
NJShoreMortgage
NJShoreMortgage
9 Posts
We had an issue locally where a developer was granted rights to build on several blocks near the beachfront in Long Branch. This wasn't a blighted area...just a working class neighborhood. The home owners organized, hired an attorney and eventually won the case reversing the order.
When cities are blighted the eminent domain can be the only realistic way to save the area...but when a blue collar neighborhood is going to be bulldozed and the developer is the one who stands to profit most (as was this case) the outcome can be favorable if the owners take a stand.
I have to wonder though... if the builder-developer wouldn't still be persuing this through the courts if the real estate market were still going strong.
Saturday 1st May 2010 09:14pm 8
Oak
Oak
36 Posts
You surfing in New Jersey Doug, awesome Dude!

If the Govy thinks it's taking any thing from me... they got another thing coming ..it reminds me of the commies or something.

Please login or sign up to post on this network.
Click here to sign up.